Do You MOOC?
Do you MOOC?
As there have been over 100 million students who have signed
up for courses via Massive Open Online Courses, or MOOCs (Class Central, 2018),
and since you are the kind of person who is reading a higher education blog,
there is a chance that you do. Or have.
I am among the 100 million. A few years ago, I
enrolled in a MOOC on the history of comic books. It was interesting and
well-presented, and I could take it on my own time, and I did not complete the
course. Which, it turns out, is one of the biggest problems with a promising
educational disruption. Or is it?
According to one report, as of 2018 over 101 million
students had participated in at least one of over 11 thousand courses offered
by over 900 colleges and universities from across the globe (Class Central,
2018). Those numbers are staggering; however, the completion rates are less
compelling. The average student completion rates for MOOCs fall somewhere
between 5-15% (EdSurge, 2018). This appears dim, until you consider the results
of the competition.
American community colleges graduate approximately 13%
of their students in two years, and 22% of their students in three years, or one-and-a-half
time as measured by how long a two-year degree “should” take for a full-time
student (Chen, 2018). Universities fair better, but are not in a position to
brag; the six-year, or time-and-a-half graduation rate, for full time
university students is 60% (NCES, n.d.). This means two out of five full-time university
students do not graduate within six years. Even if universities are
out-performing their competition, 60% is still a failing grade in any college
or university class.
We could spend time dissecting these college and
university completion rates, and come up with any number of reasons to justify
them. That might be an interesting exercise, but it is not the point of this
discussion. What I want to point out is this: American universities have been
around since the 1600’s (and are based in traditions started centuries prior). American
community colleges began serving students nearly 120 years ago. MOOCs have been
around since 2011. Given their very recent development, the graduation rates
often negatively attributed to MOOCs as a way to discount them seem a little
less dire, and a little less compelling.
Colleges and universities might learn something from
the still very new MOOC experiment. MOOCs prove education can have a very broad
reach at a very low cost to both students and institutions. MOOCs also prove
people want educational opportunities aside from those offered by traditional
institutions through traditional methods. MOOCs may currently appeal most to students
who already have a degree, or those seeking professional development (Selingo,
2014), but that is not reason enough to discount them as a potentially viable option
in higher education. It is important to remember American universities were
once the domain of wealthy, young white men; today, we are still attempting to
fully diversify higher education student populations. MOOCs may succeed at
educational democratization much more quickly than their traditional
counterparts.
There are certainly issues that need to be sorted out.
Course transcription and transferability, tuition, financial aid regulations
and obligations, and prerequisites are all potential roadblocks to the
development and implementation of MOOCs by additional colleges and
universities. Not to mention the well-documented digital divide, which prevents
many potential students from engaging in any form of online education. Despite
these concerns, and numerous others, it is premature to declare the MOOC
experiment failed. We gave brick-and-mortar universities centuries to figure it
out. Let’s give MOOCs at least a decade.
If you have thoughts, experiences, or pithy remarks related to MOOCs, I'd love to hear from you.
If you have thoughts, experiences, or pithy remarks related to MOOCs, I'd love to hear from you.
References
Chen, G. (2018). The Catch-22 of community college
graduation rates. Community College
Review. Retrieved from https://www.communitycollegereview.com/blog/the-catch-22-of-community-college-graduation-rates
Class Central. (2018). By the numbers: MOOCs in 2018. Retrieved from https://www.class-central.com/report/mooc-stats-2018/
EdSurge. (2018). Stop asking about completion rates:
Better questions to ask about MOOCs in 2019. Retrieved from https://www.edsurge.com/news/2018-11-28-stop-asking-about-completion-rates-better-questions-to-ask-about-moocs-in-2019
NCES. (n.d.). Fast facts. Retrieved from https://www.communitycollegereview.com/blog/the-catch-22-of-community-college-graduation-rates
Selingo, J. J. (2014, October 29).
Demystifying the MOOC. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/02/education/edlife/demystifying-the-mooc.html

Tim R.
ReplyDeleteHi Lora,
Excellent post. I agree, while there are many pitfalls to MOOC's (completion rates, questions whether higher ed will gain any needed revenue from them, who actually takes courses on them, etc.), they do offer some great possibilities. At present, as Dennis (2012) points out, MOOC's provide a good supplement to traditional courses. However, institutions such as Georgia Tech University state that in the future MOOCs may well be one of several types of educational offerings that an individual can take from home (Georgia Institute of Technology, n.d.). As you pointed out nicely, they have their failing at present, but we should give them time to develop, and see where we are. They may, in the end, be no better than a supplement to traditional courses, but we won't know that if we simply sat they don't work, and cast them off as a failure.
Many thanks!
Tim R.
Reference
Dennis, M. (2012). The Impact of MOOCs on higher education. College and
University, 88(2), 24-30. Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/92364/.
Georgia Institute of Technology. (n.d.). Retrieved from
https://www.news.gatech.edu/features/technology-and-future-
higher-education
Tim -
DeleteThanks so much for reading and responding. You and I seem to agree - MOOCs are unproven, but it is too early to disregard them entirely. It wasn't all that long ago traditionalists scoffed at the notion of online education, much less fully-online degrees.
Great post. In essence, MOOCs are recreational learning and have very low retention rates: roughly one in ten students will actually finish a course (Selingo, 2014). An easy way around allowing students to receive more opportunities to learn outside skills with incentive and very little exertion on the part of the University is to badge a course, certify it, or offer it in a stackable credential for non-credit. Offering a badge for a resume or LinkedIn account, or simply printing a paper certificate for a student, would ensure students had some incentive to branch out and learn other skills while preparing them more effectively for the ever-changing job market.
ReplyDeleteReference
Selingo, J. J. (2014, October 29). Demystifying the MOOC. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/02/education/edlife/demystifying-the-mooc.html
-Kristi L. Capra
Kristi -
DeleteYou offer some great ways institutions can incentivize retention and completion in MOOCs. If schools are willing to try ideas like these, there may well be a place for MOOCs in traditional higher education.
- Lora
Hi Lora!
ReplyDeleteThis is Shantel Thomas.
I wanted to commend you for your blog! It is making me go back and review mine to see if I can spruce it up as spiffy as yours! This is great!
I digress..
I appreciate most your approach to blogging and our assignments. It is interesting that you participated in a MOOC that you did not complete. While conducting research for this assignment I couldn't help but wonder if most students do not finish these courses because there is no real repercussion for not finishing? In our current courses, if we choose to not do the work or drop out after a deadline, we either are assigned an "F" grade or a "W" as evidence of incompletion. Do you feel that was part of what happened for you? Taking the course for your own growth with no tangible reward or reason may attribute to such high incompletion rates.
Furthermore, I agree with your stance that MOOCs prove that people are reaching for alternative methods to higher education learning. Researching MOOCs could potentially assist higher ed institutions with transforming their online courses. Supplementing hybrid courses even with MOOCs could also prove to be beneficial.
Thank you for blogging!
Shantel Thomas
Shantel -
DeleteThanks for reading, and for your kind words!
I think you are right on - it's like you know me. If the MOOC had been graded, or if there was any penalty to dropping (perhaps being banned from enrolling in another for a period of time), I likely would have completed. Like many people, I don't have the discipline to complete many things without some kind of reward or punishment, be it intrinsic or tangible.
Lora,
ReplyDeleteThe concept of the MOOC has obviously generate great interest in traditional higher educational institutions as these are the schools which are offering MOOCs at reduced prices rather than for-profit institutions which have tended to be the innovators in online higher education. By increasing class sizes and having teaching assistants present to interact with students, the issues of expense for schools and the lack of teacher student interaction are effectively avoiding potentially making these MOOCs as effective as other forms of online higher education. Furthermore, by ensuring that student outcomes and quality of education are examined by accrediting institutions, institutions can ensure that MOOCs provide students with high quality education. What are your thoughts??
Dr. G
Dr G -
DeleteThanks for reading, and for your thoughts.
I believe you have touched on many of the current issues regarding MOOCs an traditional higher education. It will take innovative institutions to work through these problems; that said, I believe it can be done. MOOCs are likely not the answer to all the ills of higher education, but they could be part of a larger solution.